News Story

This week our Contact team came together for a staff meeting focused on a topic that's rapidly reshaping how we all work… Artificial Intelligence (AI).
Considering its fast growth and the obvious time management benefits, AI is already embedded in the daily work of some of our departments. From integrated tools in everyday apps like spell check and Siri to more intentional uses in marketing and research, it’s clear that AI is part of our world. But as an arts charity dedicated to supporting young and emerging artists, we wanted to have a thoughtful and transparent conversation about how we use it, and perhaps more importantly, how we don’t.
Key points from the discussion included the need to understand where and how AI is being used across the organisation, and to ensure everyone understands the risks and responsibilities that come with it. Including the environmental impact, considering sustainability is one of our core values. We were a little shocked to find out that...
‘When comparing electricity demand, a single Google search takes 0.3 watt-hours of electricity, while ChatGPT takes 2.9 watt-hours of electricity. That's nearly 10 times as much.’
The Sustainable Agency (IEA, 2024)

We emphasised the importance of never sharing sensitive or identifiable information with open AI systems, and encouraged staff to ask themselves whether they'd be comfortable if the information they gave AI ever became public. The importance of understanding the differences between AI tools is key here. In particular around data sharing and the privacy implications of open-source systems like ChatGPT versus paid platforms with data agreements in place. As AI continues to evolve, we recognised the need to stay flexible, continue to learn and regularly review our policies and practices.
We discussed the growing acceptance of AI in the arts and heritage sector, with funders increasingly open, or even encouraging, its use in funding bids. However, we were clear that AI should never be used to replace actual artists in our work. Especially considering the copyright discussions around AI learning from artists and writers work. That said, we do acknowledge the evolving role of AI in artistic practice, with artists themselves choosing to use it creatively.
Alongside these considerations we also explored the benefits of AI. Especially as we are in the arts and heritage sector which often relies on small teams and limited budgets, so automation and time-saving tools can be of course be a real help. As Kate from our web developers Supercool put it in her article on AI:
'If using AI helps you sell more tickets, deliver more community engagement work and support more new artists, should we avoid it at all costs? Probably not.'
Katie M, Supercool
This was just the start of us thinking about AI. Like so many things, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer but, with a focus on tailoring our approach to fit out values, we’re committed to making thoughtful, sustainable, and artist-centred decisions as we move forward.
You might also like …
In Conversation with our Trustee, Paul Olubayo
18 March 2025I first walked into Contact, just over three years ago on the invite of then Chair of the Board Junior Akinola. Having no knowledge of the arts venue and theatre beforehand, there was so much that left me blown away on this initial visit.…Contact Adopts a Four-Day Week
6 March 2025After a successful year-long trial, Contact is proud to announce that we are permanently adopting a four-day working week on a 100:80:100 model, 100% pay for 80% of the time while maintaining 100% productivity. While this approach is still…A New CEO for Contact
31 January 2025Today we announce the appointment of Jack Dale-Dowd as the new Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Contact, following a thorough recruitment process in Autumn 2024. Jack, who has been an integral part of the Contact family for over 10 years,…